The Good Judges
|
On this page we are listing the judges and other court officials who made proper decisions in the cases involving the English family.
Some of the decisions went against Mr. English and some were in his favour. We have created this page to let the public know that there are still some judges and court officers in British Columbia who apply the law correctly and who are not part of the criminal organization that lurks inside the justice system. |
|
Justice Geoff Barrow:
In his decision made October 18, 2013, Justice Barrow dismissed three applications made by Mr. English and the two family companies Angleland and Nederland in the Mission Creek foreclosure proceedings. Mr. English had filed the applications incorrectly and then sought to withdraw them but opposing counsel would not consent to a withdrawal for strategic reasons and sought a dismissal order as if the case were heard on the merits, which would have presented a legal roadblock in any future proceedings.
Justice Barrow correctly ruled that the application were dismissed and he stated
I have expressly not done that, that is to say, not dismissed them on their merits, because in his most recent written submission, Mr. English, on his own behalf and on behalf of the corporate applicants, asked that I not do so.
Click here to read full decision of Justice Barrow
Justice Barrow has recently retired.
In his decision made October 18, 2013, Justice Barrow dismissed three applications made by Mr. English and the two family companies Angleland and Nederland in the Mission Creek foreclosure proceedings. Mr. English had filed the applications incorrectly and then sought to withdraw them but opposing counsel would not consent to a withdrawal for strategic reasons and sought a dismissal order as if the case were heard on the merits, which would have presented a legal roadblock in any future proceedings.
Justice Barrow correctly ruled that the application were dismissed and he stated
I have expressly not done that, that is to say, not dismissed them on their merits, because in his most recent written submission, Mr. English, on his own behalf and on behalf of the corporate applicants, asked that I not do so.
Click here to read full decision of Justice Barrow
Justice Barrow has recently retired.
Justice D Allan Betton:
Justice Betton was the hearing judge at the foreclosure hearing where BCIMC stole the English family property for pennies on the dollar. One would normally expect the property owner to think the judge was in on the scam but John English thinks otherwise.
According to Mr. English:
"Judge Betton was a good judge too I think and he yelled at Steve Wilson and Manuel Azevedo in Court "You're not giving me what I need to decide this case?" He was furious and could see that the two lawyers had colluded and were deliberately losing the case and our property so that BCIMC could steal it illegally in a rigged proceeding for pennies, leaving our family destitute and in poverty and ruin."
Lawyer racketeering sometimes works that way. The lawyers conspire to withhold evidence and deliberately fail to make winning arguments. They sabotage their own clients. It is illegal as hell but when the local Law Society is run by a bunch of Freemason brothers there isn't much to stop them.
This is why sometimes you see the Goddess of Justice wearing a blindfold. She is blinded by the liars who masquerade as lawyers. Next time you meet a liar ask him how he spells his occupation.
Legal racketeering is a well known phenomenon throughout Canada and most parts of the old British Empire where the legal system was crafted by the ruling class of Norman bandits that stole the land of England from the Anglo-Saxon natives and them moved their style of banditry into Ireland and Scotland disposing the natives, again, and setting up a fraudulent justice system. The system was later used to colonize and oppress people in many parts of the world including North America. Efforts at reform have seldom been successful.
Justice Betton was the hearing judge at the foreclosure hearing where BCIMC stole the English family property for pennies on the dollar. One would normally expect the property owner to think the judge was in on the scam but John English thinks otherwise.
According to Mr. English:
"Judge Betton was a good judge too I think and he yelled at Steve Wilson and Manuel Azevedo in Court "You're not giving me what I need to decide this case?" He was furious and could see that the two lawyers had colluded and were deliberately losing the case and our property so that BCIMC could steal it illegally in a rigged proceeding for pennies, leaving our family destitute and in poverty and ruin."
Lawyer racketeering sometimes works that way. The lawyers conspire to withhold evidence and deliberately fail to make winning arguments. They sabotage their own clients. It is illegal as hell but when the local Law Society is run by a bunch of Freemason brothers there isn't much to stop them.
This is why sometimes you see the Goddess of Justice wearing a blindfold. She is blinded by the liars who masquerade as lawyers. Next time you meet a liar ask him how he spells his occupation.
Legal racketeering is a well known phenomenon throughout Canada and most parts of the old British Empire where the legal system was crafted by the ruling class of Norman bandits that stole the land of England from the Anglo-Saxon natives and them moved their style of banditry into Ireland and Scotland disposing the natives, again, and setting up a fraudulent justice system. The system was later used to colonize and oppress people in many parts of the world including North America. Efforts at reform have seldom been successful.
Justice David Tysoe:
When Mr. English went to the Court of Appeal to ask for an extension of time to file an amended factum to appeal the judgement taken against him by Victoria area lawyer Greg Harney.
Unlike Justices Liz Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson, Justice Tysoe allowed Mr. Carten to speak for Mr. English who was not well and listened to the arguments.
Justice Tysoe did the right thing and the appropriate extension of time.
When Mr. English went to the Court of Appeal to ask for an extension of time to file an amended factum to appeal the judgement taken against him by Victoria area lawyer Greg Harney.
Unlike Justices Liz Bennett, Mary Saunders and Nicole Garson, Justice Tysoe allowed Mr. Carten to speak for Mr. English who was not well and listened to the arguments.
Justice Tysoe did the right thing and the appropriate extension of time.
Justice Peter Leask:
When Boughton Law Corporation was trying to force an obviously unwell and recently injured Mr. English into a stressful hearing to recover their inflated bill, Justice Peter Leask did the right thing, permitted Mr. Carten to speak for Mr. English, ordered Boughton Law Corporation to produce some documents and granted an adjournment.
So, in this case, Justice Leask did the right thing.
He also made the right order in the case of Rain Coast Water Inc. v. Government of British Columbia where he found in favour of Rain Coast and agasint the criminals in the Government.
However, Justice Leask is a Freemason and he has been known to show up in other cases where he protected a fellow Freemason judges, which is understandable, because the inner circle of legal Freemasons in British Columbia have been known to resort to murder if their members don't obey orders.
When Boughton Law Corporation was trying to force an obviously unwell and recently injured Mr. English into a stressful hearing to recover their inflated bill, Justice Peter Leask did the right thing, permitted Mr. Carten to speak for Mr. English, ordered Boughton Law Corporation to produce some documents and granted an adjournment.
So, in this case, Justice Leask did the right thing.
He also made the right order in the case of Rain Coast Water Inc. v. Government of British Columbia where he found in favour of Rain Coast and agasint the criminals in the Government.
However, Justice Leask is a Freemason and he has been known to show up in other cases where he protected a fellow Freemason judges, which is understandable, because the inner circle of legal Freemasons in British Columbia have been known to resort to murder if their members don't obey orders.
Master Grant Taylor:
When Boughton Law Corporation, again, tried to force an unwell and injured Mr. English into a court hearing to collect their inflated account Master Taylor listened to Mr. English, read the medical reports and told Boughton lawyers to back off and wait until Mr. English was well again.
When Boughton Law Corporation, again, tried to force an unwell and injured Mr. English into a court hearing to collect their inflated account Master Taylor listened to Mr. English, read the medical reports and told Boughton lawyers to back off and wait until Mr. English was well again.
Registrar Outerbridge:
Registrar Outerbridge displayed an excellent understanding of the law and a considerable amount of courage when he over-ruled court registry staff and permitted John English and his family companies to file their application that the three "crooked justices" at the Court of Appeal reconsider their judgment because they had included false statements of fact referred to as "errors of fact" in their judgment.
The court registry staff were refusing to accept the "application for reconsideration" and were telling Mr. English must go to the Supreme Court of Canada, which was untrue.
The Editors are of the opinion that the justices were "crooked" because the so-called "errors of fact" were not errors but were a deliberate attempt to mislead the public by their published reasons.
The real question is who persuaded them to make the false statement of fact, how and why. These issues have been referred to the RCMP for investigation.
Registrar Outerbridge displayed an excellent understanding of the law and a considerable amount of courage when he over-ruled court registry staff and permitted John English and his family companies to file their application that the three "crooked justices" at the Court of Appeal reconsider their judgment because they had included false statements of fact referred to as "errors of fact" in their judgment.
The court registry staff were refusing to accept the "application for reconsideration" and were telling Mr. English must go to the Supreme Court of Canada, which was untrue.
The Editors are of the opinion that the justices were "crooked" because the so-called "errors of fact" were not errors but were a deliberate attempt to mislead the public by their published reasons.
The real question is who persuaded them to make the false statement of fact, how and why. These issues have been referred to the RCMP for investigation.
This page will be updated as the various cases move along and other "good" judges apply the law as it should be applied.
